2017 National Survey of Tobacco Cessation Clinics in China: evidence from the combination of nationwidegovernment and clinic on-line survey
More details
Hide details
1
China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Tobacco Medicine and Tobacco Cessation Center, China
2
WHO Collaborating Centre for Tobacco Cessation and Respiratory Diseases Prevention, China
3
China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Center for Respiratory Diseases, China
4
China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, China
Publication date: 2018-03-01
Tob. Induc. Dis. 2018;16(Suppl 1):A345
Download abstract book (PDF)
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Background:
Accessible tobacco cessation network provide
china one of the most effective measures to avoid disability and premature
death.The purpose of thisstudywas to analyze the current status of tobacco cessation
clinics in China and identify barriers to the development of cessation
treatment, with the goal of strengthening the national tobacco cessation
network in China.
Methods:
This was a nationwideon-line survey. All 31
Provincial Health and Family Planning Commission(provincial
HFPC)and 366 health institutionswith tobacco cessation clinics were
involved.Government support and cessation clinics
status were evaluated by government and clinic questionnaire respectively. Subsequently,
we divided the clinics by if they had staffs ever participatedSmoking Cessation
Training and Research Programme. A comparative analysis was made between theparticipatedinstitution
vs. non-participant institution
(PI vs. NPI), using the proportioncomparisonand
odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals.
Results:
87.1% provincial HFPC published the notice toward general tobacco control, only 41.9% provincial HFPC transmitted “Guideline on China Clinical Smoking
Cessation ”. Among all 366 health institutionsthat reported had cessation clinic,
most 72.7% were general hospitals and set in respiratory department(230,
62.8%). PI group more likely to provide medication for smokers (P< 0.05,
OR=1.86) and had higher possibility of using micro CO
monitor (P< 0.05, OR=1.92). In addition, although
insignificant, the PI group conducted better first visit registration (P>0.05,
OR=1.18),more likely to arrange more than 6 times
follow-up visit within 6 month (P>0.05, OR=1.76).
Conclusions:
Most provincial HFPC more focused on general
tobacco control policy, lack effective support to promote cessation clinics
development. The number of hospitals that established cessation clinic were
increased with the national support, however cessation resources were imbalance
distribution and tobacco cessation treatment had not been integrated into
primary care system. Cessation treatment was still facing challenges, Smoking
Cessation Training and Research Programme standardized cessation treatment at
hospital level.