ASEAN: world's first geopolitical region to implement pictorial health warnings
More details
Hide details
1
Southeast Asia Tobacco Control Alliance (SEATCA), Thailand
Publication date: 2018-03-01
Tob. Induc. Dis. 2018;16(Suppl 1):A766
Download abstract book (PDF)
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Background and challenges to implementation:
Pictorial health warnings (PHWs) on
tobacco products are the most cost-effective means to convey harms of tobacco
use to smokers and the public. By 2017, all ten Association of Southeast Asian
Nations (ASEAN) countries had legislated PHW requirements in accordance to World
Health Organization Framework Convention on Tobacco Control Article 11
Guidelines. Strong opposition came from tobacco companies to undermine PHWs
implementation at the country level. These challenges were identified and
countered successfully.
Singapore and Thailand were the first
ASEAN countries to implement PHWs in 2004 and 2005, followed by Brunei (2008),
Malaysia (2009), Vietnam (2013), and Indonesia (2014). In 2016, Philippines
(March), Cambodia (July) and Myanmar (September) implemented PHWs. Lao PDR was
the latest country to implement (April 2017).
In most countries, the tobacco
industry interfered by lobbying policymakers to adopt smaller, ineffective PHWs
and delaying the implementation. They also mobilized allies and third parties
and misled governments with false claims that PHWs violate international
treaties on trademarks and intellectual property rights.
Intervention or response:
Industry claims and tactics were
exposed and countered with evidence-based arguments and international best
practices. Southeast Asia Tobacco Control Alliance (SEATCA) provided technical
support, display kits of sample health warnings from other ASEAN countries, and
free use of copyrighted PHWs via a regional image bank.
Results and lessons learnt:
ASEAN is the only region where all member
states have successfully implemented PHWs on tobacco packs. The power of teamwork
in fighting the industry through a regional platform and sharing experience and
resources led to this success.
Conclusions and key recommendations:
The tobacco industry uses a wide
range of tactics to oppose implementation of effective tobacco control
measures, particularly
introduction of prominent PHWs. Industry interference remains a huge threat to
public health policy in the region.