RESEARCH PAPER
An exploration of transactional states and cessation-related social variables within adolescent smokers
,
 
 
 
More details
Hide details
1
Department of Educational Psychology, Health Program Area, College of Education, University of Houston, Houston, USA
 
2
Department of Social and Behavioral Health, Texas A&M School of Rural Public Health, College Station, USA
 
 
Submission date: 2011-04-27
 
 
Acceptance date: 2012-12-10
 
 
Publication date: 2012-12-20
 
 
Corresponding author
Jay T Lee   

Department of Educational Psychology, Health Program Area, College of Education, University of Houston, Houston, TX, USA
 
 
Tobacco Induced Diseases 2012;10(December):20
 
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
Background:
Given the high rate of adolescent smoking, cessation remains a vital public health priority. This study explored archival data using a structured phenomenological framework known as Reversal Theory (RT). In order to better understand aspects of adolescent tobacco use we compared the transactional, psychological states described by RT to the factor structure of adolescents’ self-reported social environment influencing tobacco use.

Methods:
In a two step analysis of questions about self-reported tobacco use cognitions, attitudes, and behaviors from youth enrolled during the 2003–2004 period in a Texas, state-wide, mandated tobacco cessation program (N=1807), four factors and 11 items were identified as significantly related to the influence of social context and adolescents’ tobacco use. These first step results guided the items to be selected for further analysis. In step two the variables were subjected to a factor analysis using principal components extraction and varimax rotation. The resulting factor structure was compared and interpreted within the context of descriptions of RT transactional states.

Results:
The analysis indicated that four factors were closely aligned to descriptions of the Reversal Theory transactional states and could be reinterpreted from within the framework of RT. The first factor included feelings of self-efficacy for quitting (autic mastery). The second and third transactional factors diverged between one factor to quit, and an opposing transactional factor to continue to smoke. Both of these transactional states are variants of the autocentric state where one wants to experience feelings of gain with the help of others. The fourth factor could be interpreted as ’confidence’ or ‘optimism’.

Conclusions:
This intra-individual conflict revealed by the opposition of factors two and three clarifies a paradoxical issue where an adolescent wants to quit smoking with social support in one setting yet in another social environment chooses to smoke to gain or retain peer acceptance. These data illustrate that adolescent’ self-identified quit skills and social support structures are important to the quitting process. This exploratory investigation has important implications for addressing RT state reversals in youth cessation programming activities.

REFERENCES (36)
1.
Johnston LD, O’Malley PM, Bachman JG, Schulenberg JE: Monitoring the future national survey results on drug use, 1975–2004: Volume I, secondary school students. Book Monitoring the future national survey results on drug use, 1975–2004: Volume I, secondary school students, vol. 1. 2005, Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health.
 
2.
Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance – United States, 2005. Book Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance – United States, 2005, vol. 55. 2006, Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
 
3.
Youth risk behavior surveillance – United States, 2000: Youth risk behavior surveillance – United States, 2000. Book Youth risk behavior surveillance – United States, 2000, vol. 50. 2001, Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1-84.
 
4.
Colwell GB, Smith DW, Iammarino NK: Cancer risk behaviors of adolescents: results of the youth risk behavior survey. Cancer Control. 1997, 4: 179-183.
 
5.
Smith DW, Colwell B, Zhang JJ, Brimer J, McMillan C, Stevens S: Theory-based development of an adolescent tobacco use awareness program. Am J Health Behav. 2002, 26: 137-144. 10.5993/AJHB.26.2.6.
 
6.
Sussman S, Dent CW, Burton D, Stacy AW, Flay BR: Developing school-based tobacco use prevention and cessation programs. 1995, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
 
7.
Backinger CL, McDonald P, Ossip-Klein DJ, Colby SM, Maule CO, Fagan P, Colwell B: Improving the future of youth smoking cessation. Am J Health Behav. 2003, 27: S170-S184. 10.5993/AJHB.27.2.8.
 
8.
Gillespie A, Stanton W, Lowe JB, Hunter B: Feasibility of school-based smoking cessation programs. J School Health. 1995, 65: 432-437. 10.1111/j.1746-1561.1995.tb08208.x.
 
9.
Grimshaw G, Stanton A: Tobacco cessation interventions for young people. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006, 1: 1-59.
 
10.
Conrad KM, Flay BR, Hill D: Why children start smoking cigarettes: predictors of onset. Br J Addiction. 1993, 87: 1711-1724.
 
11.
Flay BR, Phil D, Hu FB, Richardson J: Psychosocial predictors of different stages of cigarette smoking among high school students. Prev Med. 1998, 27: A9-A18. 10.1006/pmed.1998.0380.
 
12.
DiFranza J, Savageau JA, Rigotti NA, Fletcher K, Ockene JK, McNeill AD, Coleman M, Wood C: Development of symptoms of tobacco dependence in youths: 30 month follow up data from the DANDY study. Tob Control. 2002, 11: 228-235. 10.1136/tc.11.3.228.
 
13.
Bandura A: Social foundations of thought and action. 1996, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
 
14.
Ajzen I, Fishbein M: Understanding attitudes and predicting behavior. 1980, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice–Hall.
 
15.
Motivational styles in everyday life: A guide to reversal theory, 1st edition. Edited by: Apter MJ. 2001, Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association.
 
16.
Apter MJ: Reversal theory, stress, and health. Stress and health: A reversal theory perspective. Edited by: Svebak S, Apter MJ. 1997, Washington, D.C: Taylor and Francis, 21-31. [Series in health psychology and behavioral medicine].
 
17.
O’Connell KA, Brooks E: Resisting urges and adopting new behaviors. Stress and health: A reversal theory perspective. Edited by: Svebak S, Apter MJ. 1997, Washington, D.C: Taylor and Francis, 157-170. [Series in health psychology and behavioral medicine].
 
18.
O’Connell KA, Gerkovich MM, Cook MR: Relapse crises during smoking cessation. Stress and health: A reversal theory perspective. Edited by: Svebak S, Apter MJ. 1997, Washington, D.C: Taylor and Francis, 95-102. [Series in health psychology and behavioral medicine].
 
19.
Lafreniere KD, Gillies LA, Cowles MP, Toner BB: Arousability and telic dominance. Advances in Reversal Theory. Edited by: Kerr JH, Murgatroyd S, Apter MJ. 1993, Amsterdam: Swets & Zeitlinger, 257-266.
 
20.
O’Connell KA, Gerkovich MM, Cook MR: Reversal theory’s mastery and sympathy states in smoking cessation. J Nurs Scholarship. 1995, 27: 311-316. 10.1111/j.1547-5069.1995.tb00894.x.
 
21.
O’Connell KA, Schwartz JE, Gerkovich MM, Bott MJ, Shiffman S: Playful and rebellious states vs. negative affect in explaining the occurrence of temptations and lapses during smoking cessation. Nicotine Tob Res. 2004, 6: 661-674. 10.1080/14622200410001734049.
 
22.
Baker TB, Piper ME, McCarthy DE, Majeskie MR, Fiore MC: Addiction motivation reformulated: an affective processing model of negative reinforcement. Psychol Rev. 2004, 111: 33-51.
 
23.
Waters A, Sayette MA: Implicit cognition and tobacco addiction. Handbook of implicit cognition and addiction. Edited by: Wiers RW, Stacy AW. 2006, Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, Inc.
 
24.
Heatherton TF, Kozlowski LT, Frecker RC, Fagerström KO: The Fagerström Test for Nicotine Dependence: A revision of the Fagerström Tolerance Questionnaire. Br J Addiction. 1991, 86: 1119-1127. 10.1111/j.1360-0443.1991.tb01879.x.
 
25.
Norusis MJ: SPSS for Windows Advanced Statistics. 1997, Chicago, IL: SPSS.
 
26.
Norusis MJ: SPSS for Professional Statistics 6.1. 1997, Chicago, IL: SPSS.
 
27.
Kaiser HF, Caffrey J: Alpha factor analysis. Psychometrika. 1965, 30: 1-14. 10.1007/BF02289743.
 
28.
Burris RF, O’Connell KA: Reversal theory states and cigarette availability predict lapses during smoking cessation among adolescents. Res Nurs Health. 2003, 26: 263-272. 10.1002/nur.10096.
 
29.
Apter MJ: Religious states of mind: A reversal theory interpretation. Advances in the psychology of religion. Edited by: Brown LB. 1985, Oxford: Pergamon, 62-75.
 
30.
Apter MJ, Svebak S: Stress from the reversal theory perspective. Stress and anxiety. Volume 12. Edited by: Spielberger CD, Strelau J. 1989, New York: Hemisphere, 39-52.
 
31.
Bechara A, Noel X, Crone EA: Loss of willpower: abnormal neural mechanisms of impulse control and decision making in addiction. Handbook of implicit cognition and addiction. Edited by: Wiers RW, Stacy AW. 2006, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
 
32.
Gerkovich MM, Cook MR, O’Connell KA, Potocky M: Reversal theory analysis of relapse crises following smoking cessation. Patient Educ Couns. 2003, 22: 91-97.
 
33.
McDonald P, Colwell B, Backinger CL, Husten C, Maule CO: Better Practices for Youth Tobacco Cessation: Evidence of Review Panel. Am J Health Behav. 2003, 27: S144-S158. 10.5993/AJHB.27.1.s2.5.
 
34.
Apter MJ: Towards a better understanding of the autic and alloic states. 2008, LA: Presented at the Instrumentation in Reversal Theory Conference Baton Rouge.
 
35.
Sussman S, Sun P, Dent CW: A meta-analysis of teen cigarette smoking cessation. Health Psychol. 2006, 25: 549-557.
 
36.
Alberts A, Elkind D, Ginsberg S: The personal fable and risk-taking in early adolescence. J Youth Adolescence. 2007, 36: 71-76.
 
 
CITATIONS (1):
1.
Flow Experience
Jon Wright
 
eISSN:1617-9625
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top