RESEARCH PAPER
Beyond the brotherhood: Skoal Bandits’
role in the evolution of marketing moist
smokeless tobacco pouches
More details
Hide details
1
Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education, University of California
San Francisco, San Francisco, USA
2
Rutgers School of Public Health, New
Jersey, USA
3
Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine,
University of California San Francisco, Box 1390, 530 Parnassus Avenue, Suite
366, San Francisco, CA 94143-1390, USA
Submission date: 2017-07-20
Acceptance date: 2017-12-05
Publication date: 2017-12-19
Corresponding author
Pamela M. Ling
Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education, University of California
San Francisco, San Francisco, USA
Tob. Induc. Dis. 2017;15(December):46
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
Background:
Since 2006, “snus” smokeless tobacco has been sold in the U.S.. However, U.S. Smokeless Tobacco
(USST) and Swedish Match developed and marketed pouched moist snuff tobacco (MST) since 1973.
Methods:
Analysis of previously secret tobacco documents, advertisements and trade press.
Results:
USST partnered with Swedish Match, forming United Scandia International to develop pouch products as
part of the “Lotus Project.” Pouched MST was not commonly used, either in Sweden or the U.S. prior to the Lotus Project’s
innovation in 1973. The project aimed to transform smokeless tobacco from being perceived as an “unsightly habit of old
men” into a relevant, socially acceptable urban activity, targeting 15–35 year-old men. While USST’s initial pouched product
“Good Luck,” never gained mainstream traction, Skoal Bandits captured significant market share after its 1983 introduction.
Internal market research found that smokers generally used Skoal Bandits in smokefree environments, yet continued to
smoke cigarettes in other contexts. Over time, pouch products increasingly featured increased flavor, size, nicotine strength
and user imagery variation.
Conclusions:
Marlboro and Camel Snus advertising mirrors historical advertising for Skoal Bandits, designed to recruit new
users and smokers subjected to smokefree places. Despite serious efforts, pouched MST marketing has been unable to
dispel its association with traditional smokeless tobacco stereotypes as macho and rural. Public education efforts to
discourage new users and dual use of MST and cigarettes should emphasize that “new” pouch products are simply
repackaging “old” smokeless tobacco.
REFERENCES (91)
1.
AC Nielsen. ScanTrack retail measurement, smokeless category, grocery chennel, Total US and 50 retail markets. Illinois 2015.
2.
Meier E, Isaksson Vogel R, O’Connor R, et al. Preference for flavored noncombustible nicotine products among smokers motivated to switch from cigarettes. Nicotine Tob Res. 2015;18(5):892–93. doi:10.1093/ntr/ntv259
3.
Adkison SE, O’Connor RJ, Bansal-Travers M, et al. Validation of a measure of normative beliefs about smokeless tobacco use. Nicotine Tob Res. 2015;18(5):801–08. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntv156.
4.
Stepanov I, Jensen J, Hatsukami D, et al. New and traditional smokeless tobacco: comparison of toxicant and carcinogen levels. Nicotine & tobacco research: official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco. 2008;10(12):1773–82. doi: 10.1080/14622200802443544.
5.
Delnevo CD, Wackowski OA, Giovenco DP, et al. Examining market trends in the United States smokeless tobacco use: 2005–2011. Tob Control. 2014;23(2):107–12.
6.
Liu ST, Nemeth JM, Klein EG, et al. Adolescent and adult perceptions of traditional and novel smokeless tobacco products and packaging in rural Ohio. Tob Control. 2014;23(3):209–14.
7.
Hatsukami DK, Ebbert Jon O, Feuer Rachel M, Irina S, Hecht SS. Changing smokeless tobacco products: new tobacco-delivery systems. American Journal of Preventative Medicine. 2007;33(6S):S368–70.
8.
Carpenter CM, Connolly GN, Ayo-Yusuf OA, Ferris WG. Developing smokeless tobacco products for smokers: an examination of tobacco industry documents. Tob Control. 2009;18:54–9.
9.
Mejia AB, Ling PM. Tobacco industry consumer research on smokeless tobacco users and product development. Am J Public Health. 2010;100(1):78–87.
10.
Alpert HR, Koh H, Connolly G. N. Free nicotine content and strategic marketing of moist snuff tobacco products in the United States: 2002-2006. Tob Control. 2008;17:332–8.
11.
Nelson DE, Paul M, Scott T, Stephen M, Gary G, Luhua ZH. Trends in smokeless tobacco use among adults and adolescents in the United States. Am J Public Health. 2006;96(5):897–905.
12.
Connolly GN. The marketing of nicotine addiction by one oral snuff manufacturer. Tob Control. 1995;4:73–9.
13.
Rogers JD. Beiner, Lois, and Clark, Pamela I. Test marketing of new smokeless tobacco products in four US cities. Nicotine Tob Res. 2010;12(1):69–72.
15.
United States Department of Health and Human Services. Preventing tobacco use among youth and young adults: a report of the surgeon general. Atlanta, GA: Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health, 2012.
18.
Peeters S, Gilmore AB. Transnational tobacco company interests in smokeless tobacco in Europe: analysis of internal industry documents and contemporary industry materials. PLoS Med. 2013;10(9):e1001506. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001506.
19.
Malone REBE. Tobacco industry documents: treasure trove or quagmire? Tob Control. 2000;9(3):334–8.
24.
Beethem SW. Identifying and exploiting the difference between the 'Moist' and 'Bandits' businesses. US Smokeless Tobacco. 1983;
http://legacy.library.ucsf.edu.... Accessed 12 Dec 2017.
28.
Smith Barney Harris U, Co. Tobacco Monitor. Scheduled further tax increases as possible contributing factors: RJ Reynolds; 1982.
http://legacy.library.ucsf.edu.... Accessed 12 Dec 2017.
29.
Connolly GN. Testimony before the United States house of representatives subcommittee on health and the environment on regulation of nicotine-containing tobacco products under the Federal Food, drug and cosmetic act (FDCA). US Smokeless Tobacco 1994 Date.
http://legacy.library.ucsf.edu.... Accessed 12 Dec 2017.
30.
Beethem SW. Identifying and exploiting the difference between the 'Moist' and 'Bandits' businesses. US Smokeless Tobacco 1983 Date.
https://industrydocuments.libr.... Accessed 12 Dec 2017.
37.
Freedman AM. Juiced up: how a tobacco giant doctors snuff brands to boost their 'kick'. Wall Street Journal. 1994.
40.
Tobacco Reporter. Skoal bandits sponsor le mans race team: Tobacco Reporter. 1983.
41.
US Tobacco, Africk S. Smokeless signals: US tobacco company college marketing program: US Smokeless Tobacco; 1982.
https://industrydocuments.libr.... Accessed 12 Dec 2017.
42.
Tobacco Reporter. Smokeless tobacco: the bright start of the US market: Tobacco Reporter. November 1983. p. 68–9.
46.
Beethem SW. The new dimensions of Skoal bandits business: strategy tied to action. US Smokeless Tobacco. 1983;
http://legacy.library.ucsf.edu.... Accessed 12 Dec 2017.
56.
United State Tobacco Refutes New York Attorney General Robert Abrams' Smokeless Tobacco Statements. US Smokeless Tobacco.
http://legacy.library.ucsf.edu.... Accessed 12 Dec 2017.
57.
Buoniconti NA, Axinn SM. Agreement between Skadden, Arps, slate, Meagher & Flom and United States tobacco company: US Smokeless Tobacco; 1984.
http://legacy.library.ucsf.edu.... Accessed 12 Dec 2017.
59.
Tobacco Reporter. New Skoal product targets cigarette smokers. Tobacco Reporter. 1995.
63.
Bickers C. An avalanche of dry snuff in pouches. Smokeshop Magazine. 2006.
64.
RJR, MF B, JA B, et al. The chemical composition of smokeless tobacco: a survey of products sold in the united states in 2006 and 2007 (20060000 AND 20070000). RJ Reynolds 2007.
https://industrydocuments.libr.... Accessed 12 Dec 2017.
65.
Nemeth JM, Liu ST, Klein EG, et al. Factors influencing smokeless tobacco use in rural Ohio Appalachia. J Community Health. 2015;37(6):1208–17.
66.
Bahreinifar S, Sheon NM, Ling P. Is snus the same as dip? Smokers’ perceptions of new smokeless tobacco advertising. Tob Control. 2013;22(2):84–90.
79.
Connolly GN. Testimony before the United States house of representatives subcommittee on health and the environment on regulation of nicotine-containing tobacco products under the Federal Food, drug and cosmetic act (FDCA). US Smokeless Tobacco 1994.
http://legacy.library.ucsf.edu.... Accessed 12 Dec 2017.
82.
Staff S. All Eyes on Smokeless. Smokeshop. 2010;1:90.
85.
Health So, Environment T, Energy UHoRCo, et al. Oversight inquiry into the adverse health effects of smokeless tobacco. US Smokeless Tobacco 1994.
90.
Agaku IT, Filippidis FT, Vardavas CI. Effectiveness of text versus pictorial health warning labels and predictors of support for plain packaging of tobacco products within the European Union. Eur Addict Res. 2015;21(1):47–52.
91.
Messer K, Vijayaraghavan M, White MM, Shi Y, Chang C, Conway KP, et al. Cigarette smoking cessation attempts among current US smokers who also use smokeless tobacco. Addict Behav. 2015; 51:113-119. doi:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addb.... PubMed PMID: PMC4558255.
CITATIONS (9):
1.
From tobacco-endgame strategizing to Red Queen's race: The case of non-combustible tobacco products
Karma McKelvey, Bonnie Halpern-Felsher
Addictive Behaviors
2.
Smokeless Tobacco Products
Vaughan Rees, Olalekan Ayo-Yusuf, Richard O'Connor
4.
Using Peer Crowd Affiliation to Address Dual Use of Cigarettes and E-Cigarettes among San Francisco Bay Area Young Adults: A Cross Sectional Study
Nhung Nguyen, Louisa Holmes, Minji Kim, Pamela Ling
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
5.
Going Smokeless: Promotional Features and Reach of US Smokeless Tobacco Direct-Mail Advertising (July 2017–August 2018)
Lauren Czaplicki, Basmah Rahman, Randall Simpson, Shyanika Rose, Michael Liu, Siobhan Perks, Meghan Moran, Barbara Schillo
Nicotine & Tobacco Research
6.
Use of internal documents to investigate a tobacco company’s strategies to market snus in the United States
Joshua Rhee, Jamilla Abugazia, Cruz Dela, David Timberlake
Tobacco Prevention & Cessation
7.
Geographic isolation predicts tobacco product use among youth: A latent class analysis
Melissa Blank, Jenny Ozga, Katelyn Romm, Ashley Douglas, Linda Alexander, Nathan Doogan, Michael Wilson, Geri Dino
The Journal of Rural Health
8.
Oral nicotine marketing claims in direct-mail advertising
Lauren Czaplicki, Minal Patel, Basmah Rahman, Stephanie Yoon, Barbara Schillo, Shyanika Rose
Tobacco Control
9.
‘No-Barriers’ tobacco product? Selling smokeless tobacco to women, people of colour and the LGBTQ+ community in the USA
Yogi Hendlin, Sarah Small, Pamela Ling
Tobacco Control