Children Learning About Second-hand Smoke (CLASS II): a large pilot cluster randomised controlled trial
More details
Hide details
1
University of York, Health Sciences, United Kingdom
2
The ARK Foundation, Bangladesh
3
University of York, United Kingdom
Publication date: 2018-03-01
Tob. Induc. Dis. 2018;16(Suppl 1):A172
Download abstract book (PDF)
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Background:
Second-hand smoke exposure puts children's health at risk.
Among other conditions, such children can acquire respiratory tract infections,
asthma and tuberculosis. Our purpose was to pilot an educational intervention for
primary school children - Smoke Free Intervention - and to assess the
feasibility of recruiting, randomizing, and measuring outcomes in a definitive
trial.
Methods:
We conducted a large pilot cluster randomised controlled-trial
in primary schools in Dhaka, Bangladesh. It recruited Year-5 children (10-12
years old) and randomly allocated eligible schools to either Smoke Free
Intervention (intervention arm) or to normal lessons (control arm). Participating
children, schoolteachers, and researchers could not be masked from the
treatment allocation. In the intervention arm, schoolteachers delivered two
45-minute educational sessions and four 15-minute refresher sessions over four weeks. Our
primary outcome was second-hand smoke exposure validated by salivary cotinine. Secondary
outcomes included respiratory symptoms, lung function tests, school attendance,
smoking uptake, and academic performance. We based our primary analysis on
intention-to-treat. The trial registration number: ISRCTN68690577.
Results:
Between April 01, 2015 and June 30, 2015, we approached 25
schools and recruited 12. Out of 576 children in year-5 in these schools, 484
were present on the day of trial recruitment; 481 consented. Six schools (245
children) were allocated to the Smoke Free Intervention arm and six (236
children) to the control. All 12 schools were retained, however, 91.4% children
(224/245) in the Smoke Free Intervention arm and 88.6% (209/236) completed
their first follow-up. Two-months after allocation, salivary cotinine at the
cluster level was 0.53 ng/ml (SD 0.36 ng/ml) in the intervention arm and 1.84
ng/ml (SD 1.49 ng/ml) in the control arm.
Conclusions:
It is feasible to recruit, randomize and retain primary schools
and children in a trial of this nature. The effectiveness of Smoke Free
Intervention should be tested in a fully powered randomized controlled trial.
CITATIONS (2):
1.
Rethinking health systems in the context of urbanisation: challenges from four rapidly urbanising low-income and middle-income countries
Helen Elsey, Irene Agyepong, Rumana Huque, Zahidul Quayyem, Sushil Baral, Bassey Ebenso, Chandani Kharel, Riffat Shawon, Obinna Onwujekwe, Benjamin Uzochukwu, Justice Nonvignon, Genevieve Aryeetey, Sumit Kane, Tim Ensor, Tolib Mirzoev
BMJ Global Health
2.
Children Learning About Second-hand Smoke (CLASS II): a mixed methods process evaluation of a school-based intervention
Cath Jackson, Rumana Huque, Farid Ahmed, Shammi Nasreen, Sarwat Shah, Jasjit Ahluwalia, Mona Kanaan, Aziz Sheikh, Kamran Siddiqi
Pilot and Feasibility Studies