INTRODUCTION

Smoking is associated with many diseases worldwide. Carbonyl, N-nitrosamines, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, and benzene are toxic components of tobacco smoke1,2. Globally, more than 1 billion adults are currently engaged in smoking behavior, with the majority expressing a desire to quit; however, only a limited number achieve successful cessation. Smoking is also a major contributor to the global disease burden3. Most deaths from smoking are attributable to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, ischemic heart disease, lung cancer, and stroke4. Studies have found that smoking cessation before the age of 40 years can reduce the odds for smoking-related death by about 90%5.

Numerous studies have shown a strong correlation between smoking and pancreatic damage6. The pancreas is the second largest digestive gland in the human body, consisting of the endocrine part that mainly secretes insulin and glucagon and the exocrine part that secretes pancreatic juice. Malfunctioning pancreatic secretion leads to pancreatic exocrine diseases: acute pancreatitis (AP), chronic pancreatitis (CP), and pancreatic cancer (PC) are the most common6. The global incidence of AP is 5–80 cases per 100000 people7, consistent with the incidence of CP, increasing annually8. PC, similar to pancreatitis, is expected to reach 18.6 cases per 100000 people worldwide by 2050, with an annual growth rate of about 1.1%9. Currently, the treatment of AP, CP, and PC is complex, with limited efficacy10-12, high recurrence rate, and poor prognosis, posing a serious threat to human health13.

Studies have shown that smoking is associated with AP, CP, and PC onset14-17. In this study, we aimed to assess the odds for developing pancreatic disease among smokers and non-smokers, and those with or without smoking cessation.

METHODS

Study design and subjects

The UK Bio-sample database is the world’s largest biomedical sample database, tracking sample data from around 500000 participants recruited between 2006 and 2020, aged 40–69 years at the time of recruitment18. With their consent, they regularly provide detailed information about blood, urine, and saliva samples and their lifestyle at clinical centers across England, Wales, and Scotland. This is then linked to their health-related records to provide a deeper understanding of how individuals experience diseases19. The study aims to observe if there is a difference between smoking cessation and non-smoking cessation in terms of the odds for pancreatic disease. The subjects were divided into smokers and non-smokers, ex-smokers and non-ex-smokers.

The project was approved by the British National Research Ethics Committee North West-Haydock. All participants provided written informed consent before participating in the study.

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

The inclusion criteria were all participants in the UKB.

Exclusion criteria were: 1) loss to follow-up; 2) lack of data such as sex, age, body mass index (BMI), Townsend Deprivation Index (TDI), smoking, and alcohol consumption; and 3) those with a history of exocrine pancreatic disease before participating in the assessment.

Baseline data

Sex, age, race, smoking, and alcohol consumption were self-reported at baseline. BMI was calculated using height and weight, measured by the assessment center. The TDI is a composite score based on four variables: unemployment, overcrowded households, non-car, and non-home ownership. Higher scores on the index indicate higher deprivation levels20. A history of diabetes mellitus (DM) and high blood pressure (HBP) was obtained through self-reports and hospital databases.

Outcome evaluation

According to the 9th and 10th International Classification of Diseases (ICD) issued by the World Health Organization (WHO), we extracted the disease codes of all samples from the UKB database. The outcome event of the study was pancreatitis or PC diagnosis, determined by whether the age at the time of diagnosis was greater than the age at the time of recruitment and confirmed by medical record review. Specific disease codes are given in Supplementary file Table 1.

Table 1

Characteristics of subjects by different smoking status, to examine the association between smoking status and the likelihood of pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer, UK Biobank, 2006–2020 (N=492855)

CharacteristicsNever smokers (N=270092) n (%)Ex-smokers (N=170885) n (%)Current smokers (N=51878) n (%)χ2/Zp
Sex5718.44<0.001
Female160095 (59.3)84459 (49.4)23938 (46.1)
Male109997 (40.7)86426 (50.6)27940 (53.9)
Age (years)57 (50-63)60 (53-65)55 (48-62)9157.4<0.001
<60158124 (58.5)78053 (45.7)33359 (64.3)
≥60111968 (41.5)92832 (54.3)18519 (35.7)
TDI (Q1-Q3)-2 (-4–0)-2 (-4–1)0 (-3–3)11588.98<0.001
Race1031.57<0.001
White245450 (90.9)155748 (91.1)45832 (88.3)
Mixed10031 (3.7)5996 (3.5)2360 (4.5)
Asian8162 (3.0)6595 (3.9)2341 (4.5)
Black1714 (0.6)648 (0.4)416 (0.8)
Other4735 (1.8)1898 (1.1)929 (1.8)
BMI (kg/m2)26 (24–30)27 (25–30)26 (24–30)3375.05<0.001
<2583137 (30.8)40362 (23.6)16299 (31.4)
25–29.99117787 (43.6)77468 (45.3)22324 (43.0)
≥3069168 (25.6)53055 (31.0)13255 (25.6)
Drinking244587 (90.6)161345 (94.4)47757 (92.1)2132.21<0.001
HBP71204 (26.4)60290 (35.3)15915 (30.7)3987.20<0.001
DM18670 (6.9)17538 (10.3)5447 (10.5)1832.86<0.001
AP1249 (0.5)1021 (0.6)352 (0.7)59.59<0.001
CP236 (0.1)256 (0.1)178 (0.3)213.36<0.001
PC766 (0.3)630 (0.4)253 (0.5)63.47<0.001

Statistical methods

The data was cleaned and imported to SPSS25.0 using Excel. The counting data with a normal distribution were represented as mean ± standard deviation, and the ANOVA test or the Kruskal-Walis H test was selected according to the homogeneity of variance test. Data with a non-normal distribution were expressed as median and interquartile range using the Kruskal-Walis H test. Categorical data are presented as percentages, and χ2 was calculated and used to calculate p values. The association between smoking, smoking cessation and pancreatitis, and PC was assessed by binary logistic regression analysis by adjusting for confounding factors such as sex, age, race, BMI, TDI, drinking, DM, and HBP and expressed as p values and adjusted odds ratios (AORs), with confidence intervals (CI) of 95%. We used subgroup analysis to identify potential effect modifiers and calculated the p-value for interaction (pinteraction).

RESULTS

Participants

Overall, 502411 participants were included within the time frame of the present study. Of those, 492855 met the eligibility criteria of the study (Figure 1) comprising 270092 never smokers, 170885 ex-smokers, and 51878 current smokers. As shown in Table 1, there were significant differences in the distribution of people in terms of sex, age, race, BMI, TDI, drinking status, HBP, and DM. AP, CP, and PC likelihood varied with smoking status, and the differences were statistically significant (p<0.001).

Figure 1

Flowchart for data filtering, UK Biobank, 2006–2020 (N=502411)

https://www.tobaccoinduceddiseases.org/f/fulltexts/190635/TID-22-130-g001_min.jpg

Outcome data

Association of smoking status with the likelihood of AP, CP, and PC

The odds for AP, CP, and PC for never smokers, ex-smokers, and current smokers are shown in Table 2. The adjusted odds for AP (AOR=1.38; 95% CI: 1.18–1.61), CP (AOR=3.29; 95% CI: 2.35–4.62), and PC (AOR=1.72; 95% CI: 1.42–2.09) were significantly higher in current smokers than in the never smokers. However, the odds for the diseases in people who quit smoking were comparable to those who never smoked.

Table 2

Univariate and multivariate logistic regression model explaining self-reported smoking status with the likelihood of acute pancreatitis, chronic pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer, UK Biobank, 2006–2020 (N=492855)

VariableSmoking statusModel 1Model 2Model 3
OR (95% CI)pAOR (95% CI)pAOR (95% CI)p
APNever smoker ®1<0.0011<0.0011<0.001
Ex-smoker1.29 (1.19–1.41)<0.0011.15 (1.06–1.25)0.0011.02 (0.91–1.14)0.753
Current smoker1.47 (1.31–1.66)<0.0011.40 (1.24–1.58)<0.0011.38 (1.18–1.61)<0.001
CPNever smoker ®1<0.0011<0.0011<0.001
Ex-smoker1.72 (1.44–2.05)<0.0011.46 (1.22–1.75)<0.0010.97 (0.68–1.37)0.844
Current smoker3.94 (3.24–4.78)<0.0013.25 (2.66–3.97)<0.0013.29 (2.35–4.62)<0.001
PCNever smoker ®1<0.0011<0.0011<0.001
Ex-smoker1.30 (1.17–1.45)<0.0011.09 (0.98–1.21)0.1280.99 (0.85–1.14)0.876
Current smoker1.72 (1.49–1.99)<0.0011.75 (1.51–2.02)<0.0011.72 (1.42–2.09)<0.001

[i] Model 1: not adjusted. AOR: adjusted odds ratio. Model 2: adjusted for sex, age, race, BMI, TDI, drinking. Model 3: adjusted for sex, age, race, BMI, TDI, drinking, DM and HBP; while AP adjusted for CP and PC, CP adjusted for AP and PC, PC adjusted for AP and CP. ® Reference category.

Association of smoking cessation with the likelihood of AP, CP, and PC

Group differences are shown in Table 3. Following adjustment for relevant confounding factors, compared with current smokers, the odds for AP decreased by about 25% in people who had quit smoking (AOR=0.76; 95% CI: 0.64–0.89; p=0.001), CP decreased by about 70% (AOR=0.31; 95% CI: 0.21–0.46; p<0.001), and PC decreased by about 40% (AOR=0.62; 95% CI: 0.50–0.76; p<0.001) in Model 3.

Table 3

Univariate and multivariate logistic regression model explaining smoking cessation with the likelihood of acute pancreatitis, chronic pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer, UK Biobank, 2006–2020 (N=492855)

VariableModel 1Model 2Model 3
OR (95% CI)pAOR (95% CI)pAOR (95% CI)p
AP0.88 (0.78–0.99)0.0390.84 (0.74–0.95)0.0070.76 (0.64–0.89)0.001
CP0.44 (0.36–0.53)<0.0010.46 (0.38–0.57)<0.0010.31 (0.21–0.46)<0.001
PC0.76 (0.65–0.87)<0.0010.65 (0.56–0.76)<0.0010.62 (0.50–0.76)<0.001

[i] Model 1: not adjusted. AOR: adjusted odds ratio. Model 2: adjusted for sex, age, race, BMI, TDI, drinking. Model 3: adjusted for sex, age, race, BMI, TDI, drinking, DM and HBP; while AP adjusted for CP and PC, CP adjusted for AP and PC, PC adjusted for AP and CP.

Subgroup analysis

As shown in Supplementary file Table 2, after grouping by sex, the odds for AP, CP, and PC were lower in males and females after smoking cessation in Model 3. There was no differential association of smoking status or cessation with the pancreatic diseases by sex (AP: pinteraction=0.845; CP: pinteraction=0.642; and PC: pinteraction=0.958).

DISCUSSION

Currently, the clinical research on the effect of smoking cessation on pancreatitis and PC is insufficient. Using a large UKB database containing nearly 500000 samples, smoking was used as a single exposure factor for the analysis of clinical data in this study, proving smoking to be a factor for AP, CP, and PC. On this basis, we further studied the impact of smoking cessation on pancreatitis and PC, and we confirmed that the odds for both decreased after smoking cessation, by constantly adjusting possible confounding factors.

It is well known that smoking is a factor for pancreatitis, mainly by inducing oxidative stress, reducing bicarbonate secretion, and stimulating pancreatic fibrosis21. Szentesi et al.6 and Aune et al.22 demonstrated a dose-dependent correlation between smoking and pancreatic tissue damage and the likelihood of pancreatitis in the clinical setting. Smoking is also an environmental factor for PC. Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is the most common pathological type of PC, primarily driven by the K-Ras oncogene23. Tobacco smoke stimulates inflammatory cell infiltration: interleukin (IL)-6, IL-11, and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, to produce an inflammatory response24,25, initiating and accelerating the progression of PC by working with Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene (KRAS)26. The study found that the odds for AP (OR=1.36; 95% CI: 1.17–1.58), CP (OR=3.30; 95% CI: 2.43–4.50) and PC (OR=1.73; 95% CI: 1.44–2.08) were significantly higher in smokers than in non-smokers, which further verified the above view.

However, whether quitting smoking reduces the odds for pancreatitis and PC is debatable. Sadr-Azodi et al.27 found that the odds for AP after 20 years of smoking cessation can be reduced to baseline levels in never smokers. A prospective study from the Chinese Chronic Disease Biological Database also showed that the odds for AP were decreased in people who quit smoking14. Majumder et al.28 proposed in a meta-analysis that the odds for AP among ex-smokers remained significantly higher than among non-smokers (HR=1.63; 95% CI: 1.18–2.27). Moreover, differences in outcomes due to insufficient duration of smoking cessation could not be ruled out. There are few clinical studies on the effect of smoking cessation on the likelihood of CP, concluding that compared with current smokers, the odds for AP and CP were significantly reduced in people who quit smoking regardless of sex.

A 2019 Japanese review of 10 cohort studies on the association between smoking and the incidence of PC found that the odds for PC decreased in men after five years of smoking cessation but not in women29. This study reported that the odds for PC in former smokers were significantly lower than those in current smokers, with the odds reduced by about 40% for males and about 35% for females, confirming the positive benefits of smoking cessation. Molina-Montes et al.30 also reported reduced PC odds after smoking cessation. It is estimated that quitting smoking can reduce the likelihood of PC-related death by about 25%31.

Strengths and limitations

The results of this study are relatively reliable because they are based on a cohort study of approximately 500000 large samples, and the confounding factors associated with pancreatic exocrine disease, such as sex, age, alcohol consumption, BMI, hypertension, diabetes, etc., have been adjusted. In addition, we found that sex differences in smoking cessation do not play a protective role in pancreatic disease.

However, there are some limitations in this study. First, due to the scarcity of data sources, the ethnic distribution was uneven, and the influence of residual confounding factors cannot be completely ruled out. Second, the baseline data used in this study cannot reflect the dynamic changes of individuals. For example, at the time of enrollment, some people were in a smoking cessation state, and it is unknown whether they smoked again during the observation period. Third, if data regarding the number of years of smoking cessation were available, this would have strengthened the study. Further, the results will be more convincing if smoking cessation-related biochemical indicators were employed. Fourth, the number of cases of AP, CP, and PC were insufficient because of the limited follow-up time of the UKB queue.

CONCLUSIONS

We confirmed that smoking leads to increased odds for pancreatitis and PC, through a systematic analysis of prospective data from UKB, and further analysis showed that smoking cessation reduces the odds for AP, CP, and PC. Therefore, it is necessary to provide health education among smokers and persuade them to quit smoking early.