CONFERENCE PROCEEDING
Effectiveness of text-only cigarette health warnings in Japan: Findings from the 2018 International Tobacco Control (ITC) Japan Survey
More details
Hide details
1
National Cancer Center, Tokyo, Japan
2
University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Canada
3
Japan Cancer Society, Tokyo, Japan
4
Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan
Publication date: 2019-10-12
Tob. Induc. Dis. 2019;17(Suppl 1):A60
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
Objective:
Health warnings are an effective strategy for
communicating information on smoking-related health
harms, encouraging smoking cessation, and preventing
smoking initiation. This study is the first to examine the
effectiveness of existing text-only health warnings, identify
key indicators of health warning effectiveness, and assess
support for pictorial warnings in Japan.
Methods:
Data are from the 2018 International Tobacco Control (ITC)
Japan Survey, a web-based cohort survey of adult cigarette
smokers (n=3306), dual users of cigarettes/heated tobacco
products (n=555), and non-cigarette smokers (n=823). Six
key indicators of health warning effectiveness: salience
(noticing, reading); cognitive responses (thinking about
harms, quitting); and behavioral responses (forgoing
cigarette, avoiding warnings). Respondents were asked
whether they supported pictorial warnings on cigarette
packs. Weighted multivariable logistic regression models
were used to assess predictors of health warning
effectiveness and support for pictorial warnings by
demographics, and smoking status.
Results:
15.6% of respondents noticed health warnings, and 7.9%
read or looked closely at warnings. 10.3% of respondents
said that the warnings stopped them from having a
cigarette, and 7.2% avoided warnings. Although 27.5% of
respondents said the warnings made them think about
health risks of smoking, only 2.7% said the warnings
made them more likely to quit. There were few differences
by smoking status across most indicators of warning
effectiveness, with the exception of higher noticing of
warnings among cigarette smokers (30.0%) vs dual users
(20.6%) and non-cigarette smokers (11.7%). A majority
of respondents (57.6%) support pictorial warnings, with
lower support among cigarette smokers (29.4%) vs dual
users (36.2%) and non-cigarette smokers (64.2%).
Conclusions:
Japan’s existing text-only warnings are ineffective across
all key indicators of warning salience, and behavioral and
cognitive responses to warnings. While there is majority
support for pictorial warnings in Japan, it is still well below
the level of support found in other countries.
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
GTF has served as an expert witness on behalf of governments in litigation involving the tobacco industry. All other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
FUNDING
The 2018 ITC Japan Survey was supported by a grant from The National Cancer Center, with additional support provided by a Canadian Institutes of Health Research Foundation Grant (FDN-148477).