Family and school socioeconomic status as predictors of tobacco and e-cigarette use in adolescents: a study from a perspective of material, human, and social capital
More details
Hide details
1
Centro de Estudios de Estado y Sociedad (CEDES), Argentina
2
Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Argentina
3
University of South Carolina, Department of Health Promotion, Education, and Behavior, United States of America
4
Universidad de Buenos Aires, Hospital de Clínicas, Argentina
Publication date: 2018-03-01
Tob. Induc. Dis. 2018;16(Suppl 1):A928
Download abstract book (PDF)
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Background:
The contradictory
findings about the role of the socioeconomic status (SES) in accounting for
substance use in adolescence can be explained by the lack of consensus on how
best to conceptualize and measure SES. Based on Coleman's social theory, this
study examines the association of family and school SES with tobacco and
e-cigarette use.
Methods:
Data came from a
cross-sectional, school-based survey of middle-school early adolescents
attending 33 schools in three Argentinian cities (n=3,110). Family SES was
evaluated using: 1) family affluence scale (FAS) for material capital, 2)
parent education for human capital, and 3) nuclear family and parent-adolescent
communication for social capital. A school SES index was computed aggregating
FAS and parent education from students. Multilevel logistic regression models
regressed current tobacco use (in the past 30 days) and ever e-cigarette use on
family and school-level SES, controlling for sex and age.
Results:
17.7% students were
current tobacco smokers and 7.7% have ever used e-cigarette. At family level,
material capital was unassociated with tobacco smoking, but positively
associated with e-cigarette use; human capital was unassociated with both tobacco
smoking and e-cigarette use; and social capital was inversely associated with
both tobacco smoking and e-cigarette use. After adjusting for family SES,
students from schools with higher SES had lower likelihood of tobacco smoking
(OR=0.25, 95%CI 0.09-0.74) and higher likelihood of e-cigarette use (OR=4.36,
95%CI 1.25-15.23) than those from schools with lower SES.
Conclusions:
Family capital
measures are differentially related to student substance use, pointing out that
SES indicators are not interchangeable. School SES has an independent effect on
substance use above and beyond that of family SES. These findings emphasize the
need for SES conceptualization and consistent selection of indicators in order
to study the effect of SES on health research and its role in identifying
students at-risk of substance use.
CITATIONS (2):
1.
Social Capital and Prosocial Behavior among German Children
Helen Barton, Jared Thorpe, Mikaela Dufur
Social Sciences
2.
Prevalence and correlates of lifetime e-cigarette use among adolescents attending public schools in a low income community in the US
Kenneth Tercyak, Lilianna Phan, Katia Gallegos-Carrillo, Darren Mays, Janet Audrain-McGovern, Kathryn Rehberg, Yameng Li, Francisco Cartujano-Barrera, A. Cupertino
Addictive Behaviors