Health-care provider intervention and utilization of cessation assistance in low- and middle-income countries
More details
Hide details
1
Georgia State University, School of Public Health, United States of America
2
East Tennessee State University, Biostatistics and Epidemiology, United States of America
3
East Tennessee State University, United States of America
4
Indian Institute of Technology, India
5
East Tennessee State University, Health Services Management and Policy, United States of America
Publication date: 2018-03-01
Tob. Induc. Dis. 2018;16(Suppl 1):A352
Download abstract book (PDF)
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Background:
The psychological and physiological addictive
nature of tobacco smoking makes it difficult for some smokers to quit without
assistance. Tobacco cessation and utilization of cessation assistance rates are
low in low-and-middle income countries (LMICs). It is not clear if health care
provider tobacco screening and quit advice promote utilization of assistance to
quit tobacco.This study examined the relationship between health care provider intervention and
utilization of cessation assistance in 12 LMICs.
Methods:
Data from 13967 participants of the Global Adults Tobacco Survey
(GATS) in 12 LMICs were analyzed. Outcome variables were utilization of
counseling/cessation clinic, prescription medication, quit line and any
cessation assistance. Health care provider intervention ('no intervention',
'tobacco screening', 'quit advice') was the independent variable. Four multiple
logistic regression models were fit to evaluate the relationship between the
independent variable and each outcome, adjusting for covariates. All analyses
were conducted using SAS version 9.4. Adjusted odds ratios (ORs) with 95%
confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated.
Results:
Approximately 52%,
8%, and 40% of participants received no intervention, tobacco screening, and
advice to quit, respectively. Overall, 0.4%, 1.9%, 3.0% and 4.5% used quit
line, counseling/cessation clinic, prescription medication, and any cessation
assistance, respectively. Compared to no intervention, quit advice was
associated with increased utilization of counseling/cessation clinic (OR=4.41,
95% CI=3.2-6.1), prescription medication (OR=1.67, 95% CI=1.2-2.3) and any
assistance (OR=2.80, 95% CI=2.2-3.6).
Conclusions:
A comprehensive
tobacco control program, with frequent tobacco screening and quit advice by health
care providers may improve utilization of cessation assistance in LMICs.