Impact of smoke-free home on smoking intensity in low- and middle-income countries
More details
Hide details
1
Georgia State University, School of Public Health, United States of America
2
East Tennessee State University, Biostatistics and Epidemiology, United States of America
3
Indian Institute of Technology, India
4
East Tennessee State University, Health Services Management and Policy, United States of America
Publication date: 2018-03-01
Tob. Induc. Dis. 2018;16(Suppl 1):A856
Download abstract book (PDF)
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Background:
Smoke-free policy is
associated with smoking reduction; however, it is unknown if the reduction in
smoking intensity occurs across the stages of smoking cessation, and there is
paucity of literature on the relationship between home smoking rule and smoking
intensity in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). The aim of this study
was to conduct a cross-country evaluation of the relationship between home
smoking rule and smoking intensity among smokers in different stages of smoking
cessation.
Methods:
Data from 39,204 current smokers from the Global Adult Survey (GATS),
2009-2012 from 17 LMICs were analyzed. Weighted multiple linear regression
analyses were conducted using the log of smoking intensity as the outcome
variable with home smoking rule as the main independent variable. Adjusted
regression coefficients (β) with associated 95% confidence intervals (CI) were
estimated.
Results:
Overall, the average smoking intensity was
approximately 15, 14, and 13 for home smoking allowed, smoking restriction and
smoke-free rules, respectively. There was a 12.7% (95% CI=7.6%-17.8%)
and a 22.5% (95% CI=17.1%-28.0%)
reduction in smoking intensity among adults in precontemplation from homes with
smoking restriction and smoke-free rules, respectively. Among adults in
contemplation, smoking restriction and smoke-free rules were associated with a
21.5% (95% CI=6.0%-36.9%) and an
18.6% (95% CI=9.0%-28.2%)
reduction in smoking intensity, respectively. For adults in preparation,
smoke-free rule was associated with a 19.4% (95% CI=3.9%-34.9%) reduction in smoking intensity.
Conclusions:
Smoke-free homes are
associated with a significant reduction in smoking intensity across the first
three stages of the transtheoretical model. This suggests that, banning public
smoking may have added benefit by reducing smoking intensity, since evidence
suggests that people who work in smoke-free environments are more likely to
live in smoke-free homes.