Innovative health financing for tobacco control: the implementation and effectiveness of India's “Movie Rules”
More details
Hide details
1
Vital Strategies, Policy, Advocacy and Communication, United States of America
2
World Health Organization, India, India
3
Vital Strategies, Policy, Advocacy and Communication, India
4
World Health Organisation - India, India
Publication date: 2018-03-01
Tob. Induc. Dis. 2018;16(Suppl 1):A680
Download abstract book (PDF)
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Background:
Tobacco consumption is a critical concern in populous
low-income countries, like India. The
social acceptability of tobacco perpetuates its use: the positive portrayal of
tobacco in the media has been associated with increased consumption of tobacco.
Hence, to counter the pro-tobacco imagery in the visual media, the Government
of India modified its tobacco control law in 2011/2012, called as "Film
Rule", requiring film theaters and television channels to screen
pre-approved anti-tobacco public service announcements and a disclaimer at the
beginning and during the middle of programs when tobacco consumption is
depicted; and, health warning scrolls on screen while tobacco is in use
onscreen.
Methods:
Four studies were undertaken to monitor the genesis,
implementation and effectiveness of the Rule. First, a news media analysis in
the lead up the implementation of the Film Rule identified industry arguments
against the Rule. Two observational studies, including exit interviews of
cinema-goers, monitored the implementation and effectiveness of the Rule.
Finally, legal research identified legal loopholes and opportunities.
Results:
Findings from this comprehensive set of studies
identified standard arguments against the Rule - such as impingement of
creative freedom, arguments that health warnings are ineffective - and provide
guidance for addressing these attacks preemptively. The observational studies
identified over 80% compliance with the Film Rule in film theaters but less
than 10% compliance by television channels. Exit interviews among film-goers
also found positive impact among those exposed to anti-tobacco messaging. Legal
research identified strengths in the current law, enabling implementation, and
opportunities for its advancement within existing media laws and procedures.
Conclusions:
The Film Rule is a novel health financing mechanism
for sustained mass media campaigns at low (or no) cost to governments. Our
studies show positive impact of the Rule and offer valuable lessons for
strengthening the law within India and for other countries considering similar
approaches.