Policy perspective on the global use of Smokeless Tobacco (ST): a literature review
More details
Hide details
1
University of York, Health Sciences, United Kingdom
2
University of York, United Kingdom
Publication date: 2018-03-01
Tob. Induc. Dis. 2018;16(Suppl 1):A572
Download abstract book (PDF)
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Background:
Globally, Smokeless Tobacco (ST) is consumed by over 300
million people. ST is addictive and most products cause cancers of the oral
cavity, pharynx and oesophagus. The aim of this review was to identify knowledge
gaps in the implementation of key demand-reduction measures with regard to ST.
Methods:
A series of
focused literature reviews was conducted and findings were synthesized by
relevant Articles (6 - 14) of the World Health Organization Framework
Convention on Tobacco Control (WHO FCTC).
Results:
We found
sufficient evidence to support implementation of key demand-reduction
measures for ST. For example, raising taxes can reduce ST consumption,
with price elasticity on a par with, or sometimes higher than, cigarettes.
Similarly, graphic pictorial warnings on ST packaging are far more
effective than text-only warning labels. But despite supportive evidence,
countries have either not implemented measures or have kept the bar much
lower than that for cigarettes. For example, very few countries regulate the
contents of ST products. Some have raised ST taxes but not to the extent
of cigarette taxes, risking product substitution. Similarly,
health-warning requirements for ST are less strict than those for
cigarettes. Even where strong policies exist, compliance has been poor.
For example, despite bans on ST advertising, most suppliers continue to promote
products, especially at points of sale and via print and digital media.
Consequently, ST demand-reduction measures have had limited impact.
Conclusions:
The full
implementation of FCTC Articles 6-14 is likely to reduce the global
demand for ST, but their current state of implementation lags behind that
for cigarettes. The existing policy gaps can be addressed through better
knowledge of ST products, setting unambiguous standards, innovative
systems for tax administration, building capacity in testing ST products
and undertaking targeted research.