Prevalence, perceptions and predictors of menthol cigarettes among African smokers: findings from the ITC Kenya and Zambia Surveys
 
More details
Hide details
1
University of Waterloo, Canada
 
2
Kenya Medical Research Institute, Kenya
 
3
University of Zambia, Zambia
 
4
University of Nairobi, Kenya
 
5
Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Canada
 
6
Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Canada
 
 
Publication date: 2018-03-01
 
 
Tob. Induc. Dis. 2018;16(Suppl 1):A487
 
Download abstract book (PDF)

KEYWORDS
WCTOH
 
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Background:
Research in high-income countries (HICs) has raised awareness of the harms of menthol cigarettes, providing the foundation for a growing movement in HICs to ban menthol. Menthol masks the harshness of smoke, making it easier for youth to start smoking, and encouraging health-concerned smokers to switch to menthols, incorrectly believing that menthols are less harmful. There are few studies of menthols in LMICs, and almost none in Africa. We conducted the first population study in Africa to assess the prevalence of menthol cigarettes, beliefs about harmfulness of menthols, and predictors of menthol use.

Methods:
Data were from the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Kenya Wave 1 (2012) and Zambia Wave 2 Survey (2014). These are longitudinal surveys of nationally representative samples of adults in each country. This study focuses on 1,449 smokers who answered questions on use, choice, and perceptions of menthol cigarettes (Zambia only).

Results:
Prevalence of menthols was high in Zambia (43%, highest of 24 ITC countries) and Kenya (21%, third-highest). In Zambia, the erroneous belief that menthols are less harmful was high (36%—second-highest), and most common among younger (69%), medium-income (36%), and non-daily smokers (42%). In Zambia, menthol use was associated with: belief that menthol is less harmful (OR=3.68,p=0.01), choosing brand because of taste (OR=2.46,p=0.01), health concerns (OR=3.32,p=0.0001), and price (OR=0.31,p=0.04). In Kenya, menthol use was associated with: choosing brand because of taste (OR=3.49,p=0.0002), price (OR=1.73,p=0.05); health concerns (OR=1.57,p=0.04); and perceiving that quitting is beneficial (OR=1.78,p=0.04).

Conclusions:
Menthol use was high in Zambia and Kenya, and predicted by health concerns. This is alarming because many smokers (in Zambia) incorrectly believe that menthols are less harmful. These findings support the need for African countries to raise awareness of the myth of menthols and to ban menthol and other flavorings to reduce initiation among youth and to encourage smokers to quit.

 
CITATIONS (2):
1.
Menthol and flavored tobacco products in LMICs: A growing menace
Mateusz Zatoński, Karin Silver, Sarah Plummer, Rosemary Hiscock
Tobacco Induced Diseases
 
2.
The Impact of Menthol Cigarette Bans: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Sarah D Mills, Snigdha Peddireddy, Rachel Kurtzman, Frantasia Hill, Victor Catalan, Jennifer S Bissram, Kurt M Ribisl
Nicotine and Tobacco Research
 
eISSN:1617-9625
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top