RESEARCH PAPER
Sharp changes in tobacco products affordability and the dynamics of smoking prevalence in various social and income groups in Ukraine in 2008–2012
More details
Hide details
1
Institute for Strategic Research of the Ministry of Health of Ukraine, Kiev, Ukraine
Submission date: 2013-07-04
Acceptance date: 2013-10-16
Publication date: 2013-10-18
Corresponding author
Konstantin Krasovsky
Institute for Strategic Research of the Ministry of Health of Ukraine,
Kiev, Ukraine
Tobacco Induced Diseases 2013;11(October):21
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
Background:
To curb the tobacco epidemic, successful implementation of tobacco control measures should take into account how specific demographic groups react to particular policies. In 2005–2010, Ukraine experienced a sharp decline in smoking prevalence. In 2008–2010, several excise tax hikes combined with the economic recession resulted in a sharp reduction of tobacco product affordability, but in 2011–2012 tax increases were rather moderate. The aim of the current research was to investigate how smoking prevalence in various gender, social and income groups in Ukraine changed in response to differing tobacco taxation policies in 2008–2012.
Methods:
The State Statistics Service of Ukraine annual household surveys among the population aged 12 years and older, which include questions about smoking, were used. The aggregate data from the annual household surveys datasets of 2008–2012 were analyzed.
Results:
The decline in general smoking prevalence was much steeper in 2008–2010 – 3.2 percentage points in two years, while in two subsequent years it constituted only 0.6 percentage points. Smoking prevalence declined in all age, social, and income groups in 2008–2010. However, in 2011–2012 smoking prevalence continued to decline mainly among young and poor people, while some older and more affluent smokers apparently relapsed to smoking.
Conclusions:
Short-term and long-term price responsiveness of tobacco demand by socioeconomic status of population groups in low--and middle--income countries like Ukraine could be rather different for poor and more affluent people. Tobacco excise tax hikes have great potential in reducing smoking prevalence, especially in young and less affluent people, however they should also be supported by effective and available smoking cessation services.
REFERENCES (19)
1.
IARC Handbooks of Cancer Prevention: Effectiveness of tax and price policies for tobacco control. 2011, Lyon, France: IARC Press, Tobacco Control, Vol. 14.
2.
World Health Organization: WHO report on the global tobacco epidemic, 2009: implementing smoke-free environments. 2009, Geneva: WHO.
3.
World Health Organization: WHO report on the global tobacco epidemic, 2011: warning about the dangers of tobacco. 2011, Geneva: WHO.
4.
Andreeva T, Kharchenko N, Krasovsky K, et al: Global adult tobacco survey (GATS), Ukraine 2010. 2010, Kiev: Ministry of Health.
5.
Ross H, Stoklosa M, Krasovsky K: Economic and public health impact of 2007–2010 tobacco tax increases in Ukraine. Tob Control. 2012, 21 (4): 429-435. 10.1136/tc.2010.040071.
6.
State Statistical Service of Ukraine: Population’s self- perceived of health status and availability of selected types of medical aid in 2008. 2009, Kiev: State Statistical Service of Ukraine, in Ukrainian.
7.
State Statistical Service of Ukraine: Population’s self- perceived of health status and availability of selected types of medical aid in 2009. 2010, Kiev: State Statistical Service of Ukraine, in Ukrainian.
8.
State Statistical Service of Ukraine: Population’s self- perceived of health status and availability of selected types of medical aid in 2010. 2011, Kiev: State Statistical Service of Ukraine, in Ukrainian.
9.
State Statistical Service of Ukraine: Population’s self- perceived of health status and availability of selected types of medical aid in 2011. 2012, Kiev,
http://ukrstat.gov.ua/druk/kat... (in Ukrainian).
10.
State Statistical Service of Ukraine: Population’s self- perceived of health status and availability of selected types of medical aid in 2012. 2013, Kiev,
http://ukrstat.gov.ua/druk/kat... (in Ukrainian).
12.
Krasovsky K: Tobacco taxation policy in three Baltic countries after the EU accession. Tobacco Control and Public Health in Eastern Europe. 2012, 2 (2): 81-98.
13.
Andreeva TI, Krasovsky KS: Recall of tobacco pack health warnings by the population in Ukraine and its association with the perceived tobacco health hazard. Int J Public Health. 2011, 56 (3): 253-262. 10.1007/s00038-010-0226-4.
14.
Dunlop SM, Cotter T, Perez DA: Impact of the 2010 tobacco tax increase in Australia on short-term smoking cessation: a continuous tracking survey. Med J Aust. 2011, 195 (8): 469-472. 10.5694/mja11.10074.
15.
Hanewinkel R, Isensee B: Five in a row–reactions of smokers to tobacco tax increases: population-based cross-sectional studies in Germany 2001–2006. Tob Control. 2007, 16 (1): 34-37. 10.1136/tc.2006.017236.
16.
Reed MB, Anerson CM, Vaughn JW, Burns DM: The effect of cigarette price increases on smoking cessation in California. Prev Sci. 2008, 9: 47-54. 10.1007/s11121-008-0081-1.
17.
NonnemakerJ HJ, HomsiG BA: Self-reported exposure to policy and environmental influences on smoking cessation and relapse: a 2-year longitudinal population-based study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2011, 8: 3591-3608. 10.3390/ijerph8093591.
18.
Krasovsky K, Andreeva T, Krisanov D, et al: Economics of tobacco control in Ukraine from the public health perspective. 2002, Kiev: ADIC-Ukraine.
19.
Selvaraj S, Karan AK, Srivastava S: Price elasticity of tobacco products among quintile groups in India. 2009–10, Available at SSRN 2289221, 2013 –
http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/De....
CITATIONS (5):
1.
Cigarette Smoking Trends and Social Disparities Among South African Adults, 2003–2011
Olalekan A. Ayo-Yusuf, Bukola G. Olutola, Israel T. Agaku
Nicotine & Tobacco Research
2.
Reduced affordability of cigarettes and socio-economic inequalities in smoking continuation in Stakhanov, Ukraine, 2009
M. Leinsalu, A. Stickley, A. E. Kunst
The European Journal of Public Health
3.
Social phenomena following the tobacco tax increase in
South Korea: Lessons and policy implications
Myung-Bae Park, Eun Nam, Hye Lee, Kyoung Hong, Yumi Oh
Tobacco Induced Diseases
4.
The battle to increase tobacco taxes: Lessons from Philippines and Ukraine
Connie Hoe, Caitlin Weiger, Joanna Cohen
Social Science & Medicine
5.
A systematic review and network meta-analysis of population-level interventions to tackle smoking behaviour
Shamima Akter, Md. Mizanur Rahman, Thomas Rouyard, Sarmin Aktar, Raïssa Shiyghan Nsashiyi, Ryota Nakamura
Nature Human Behaviour