Background:Future
developments in tobacco control are likely to involve personalisation of
treatment to improve efficiency. Pharmacotherapy provision based on Nicotine
Metabolite Ratio (NMR) status has been shown to improve outcomes in clinical
trials: normal relative to slow metabolisers benefit more from varenicline than
nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) treatment. However, it is unknown whether this
effect translates to other settings.
Methods:Data
come from 1,563 participants attending English Stop Smoking Services in
2012/13. Sociodemographic, mental/physical health, smoking (dependence, determination
to quit) and treatment characteristics (varenicline vs. NRT; group vs.
one-to-one behavioural support) were assessed at baseline. Baseline salivary
nicotine metabolites were measured and NMR (3-hydroxycotinine/cotinine) status computed,
characterising smokers as slow (NMR< 0.31, N=454) or normal (NMR≥0.31,
N=1,109) metabolisers. Carbon-monoxide verified 2-week and 50-week continuous
abstinence was assessed at 4-week and 52-week follow-up post-quit, respectively.
The association between abstinence rates and predictor variables was determined
using log-binomial generalised linear models that included a pharmacotherapy by
NMR status interaction term and controlled for all covariates. All analyses
were intention-to-treat.
Results:Of
participants, 44.2% (95% confidence interval (CI) 41.8-46.7%) and 8.0% (95%CI
6.8-9.5%) were continuously abstinent at 4-week and 52-week follow-up,
respectively. There was no evidence of a pharmacotherapy by NMR status
interaction on either outcome in adjusted analysis (see Figure). Higher
abstinence rates were independently associated with higher socio-economic
group, treatment with varenicline, lower dependence and greater age at both follow-ups and with greater determination to quit
and group support at 4-week follow-up, only.
[Figure]Conclusions:Our
study did not replicate clinical trial data, indicating that NMR status does
not substantially contribute to differential pharmacotherapy effectiveness in Stop
Smoking Services. As this was an observational study, self-selection or unmeasured
confounders may have influenced results. However, this suggests the effect of
NMR in real-world settings is likely to be small, context-dependent and
therefore may not translate globally.