The use of and beliefs about menthol cigarettes among Brazilian smokers: findings from Wave 3 (2016-17) of the ITC Brazil Survey
More details
Hide details
1
University of Waterloo, Canada
2
Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, Brazil
3
Fundaçao do Cancer, Brazil
4
University of Waterloo, Dept of Psychology and School of Public Health and Health Systems, Canada
5
Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Canada
6
University of South Carolina, Arnold School of Public Health, United States of America
7
National Institute of Public Health, Mexico
Publication date: 2018-03-01
Tob. Induc. Dis. 2018;16(Suppl 1):A486
Download abstract book (PDF)
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Background:
Menthol and other flavorings are appealing to young people. They mask
the adverse effects of cigarette smoke, such as throat irritation, and are
marketed as less harmful to appeal to health-concerned smokers. In March 2012,
Brazil banned all flavors in tobacco products, including menthol, but the ban
has not been implemented due to industry legal challenges. This is the first
study in Brazil to examine menthol use and beliefs about menthols (particularly
harm perceptions). Such research can increase an understanding of menthol use to
inform/support regulatory action in Brazil and other countries.
Methods:
Data were from Wave 3 (2016-17) of the International Tobacco Control
(ITC) Brazil Survey, a cohort survey of adult smokers and non-smokers in Rio de
Janeiro, São Paulo, and Porto Alegre. This study analyzed responses from 1216
smokers on prevalence and predictors of menthol use, beliefs about harmfulness,
and support for banning additives.
Results:
In 2016-17, 7.8% of smokers with a regular cigarette brand reported that
they smoked menthols (lowest of 10 ITC LMICs). 12.5% of smokers erroneously believed
that menthol cigarettes are less harmful than regular cigarettes (lowest of 7
ITC middle-income countries); 33.4% believed menthols are smoother on the
throat and chest (lowest of 4 LMICs). 59.6% of smokers support a complete ban
on all additives including flavorings (3rd highest among 14 ITC countries).
Conclusions:
These findings support Brazil's effort to ban all additives
including menthol: menthol prevalence is comparatively low, erroneous beliefs
that menthols are less harmful is low, and support for an additive ban is high. Brazilian media reporting of the risks of additives in the
context of the tobacco industry injunction may have raised public awareness of the harms of
additives and support for the ban. Also, the 2014 ban on advertising at points of sale may have reduced exposure to marketing of menthols.
CITATIONS (1):
1.
Menthol and flavored tobacco products in LMICs: A growing
menace
Mateusz Zatoński, Karin Silver, Sarah Plummer, Rosemary Hiscock
Tobacco Induced Diseases