Tobacco industry's use of litigation to stop tobacco control measures in Brazil
More details
Hide details
1
The Union, Tobacco Control, Mexico
2
Brazilian National Cancer Institute, CONICQ, Brazil
Publication date: 2018-03-01
Tob. Induc. Dis. 2018;16(Suppl 1):A670
Download abstract book (PDF)
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Background and challenges to implementation:
Brazil is the highest-performing countries in
its efforts to develop 
policies and programs to implement FCTC.
The tobacco industry (TI) continues to hamper Brazil's
efforts to fully implement FCTC, interfering in the adoption of such measures,
or preventing implementation when they are adopted, challenging in national
courts. 

ANVISA is the regulatory agency responsible for regulating
tobacco in Brazil. Two different legislations enacted by the agency (ban of
additives and health warnings) are being challenged in Courts. This challenge
is delaying the fully protection of Brazilian population from the harms caused
by tobacco.
Intervention or response:
A coalition of tobacco
control partners was created, representing government health agencies, academia
and health NGOs, in order to fight in this battle. Coalition members had regular
meetings with the Supreme Court to urge the release of the injunction that stopped
the effects of additive ban. Members of the civil society filed two amicus
brief in support of ANVISA. Mobilization of legislators and public health
institutions to contact the Supreme Court through letters of support was done. A
dissemination of tobacco control guidelines for the Judiciary Power informing about
FCTC was another strategy adopted. Technical assistance for the formal response
was sent to federal prosecutors and scientific evidence to support the
legislation was provided.
Results and lessons learnt:
A major success of this
group of initiatives was the scheduling of the hearing on the additives ban for
August 17, 2018, since the lawsuit started in 2013 and the TI access to the
Court had kept it off the hearing agenda. This work will provide a discussion
and an analysis of the TI arguments and the counter arguments used to defend
the public health laws.
Conclusions and key recommendations:
It is important to create a coalition to defend against
the TI use of legal strategies to prevent the implementation of the tobacco
control.