Towards understanding the features of the waterpipe tobacco industry: findings from two consecutive visits to the International Hookah Fair
More details
Hide details
1
Imperial College London, Public Health Policy Evaluation Unit, United Kingdom
2
American University of Beirut, Faculty of Health Sciences, Lebanon
3
American University of Beirut, Clinical Research Institute, Lebanon
4
Brighton and Sussex Medical School, United Kingdom
5
London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, United Kingdom
Publication date: 2018-03-01
Tob. Induc. Dis. 2018;16(Suppl 1):A456
Download abstract book (PDF)
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Background:
Understanding
the internal structures of the tobacco industry is vital in the development of effective
tobacco policy. Currently, little is known about the waterpipe tobacco industry.
We aimed to understand more about product development, marketing methods,
compliance with legislation and features of the waterpipe tobacco industry.
Methods:
We
attended two annual waterpipe tobacco industry exhibitions held in Frankfurt,
Germany, in 2014 and 2015. We collected information on the types of products on
display, analysed marketing material, assessed compliance with health warning
and labelling requirements, and questioned exhibitors to gather information
about the features of the industry, including supply chains, cross-industry
collaborations, customer loyalty, and lobby group membership.
Results:
Despite
its presentation as a waterpipe trade exhibition, the fair was dominated by
electronic cigarette (e-cigarette) companies and e-cigarette-like technology in
waterpipe apparatuses. Waterpipe tobacco companies appeared distinct from those
marketing e-cigarette-like waterpipe products. Marketing material across
waterpipe tobacco products and accessories included claims of reduced harm
(compared to cigarette smoking), safety, and quality. None of the 15 tobacco
products collected complied with health warning and labelling requirements of FCTC
Article 11, and over half of charcoal products contained misleading descriptors
of safety and quality. Discussions with exhibitors identified a globalised but
decentralised and industry with growing ties to transnational tobacco companies.
Most waterpipe tobacco companies are family-run businesses with an absence of strategic
partnerships such as lobby group membership. Deliberate breaches of tobacco
policy, such as the use of high levels of glycerine in the tobacco
manufacturing process, were confirmed by company representatives.
Conclusions:
Our
observations add insight into key features of the waterpipe tobacco industry
and can guide policy dialogue. We call for a waterpipe-specific policy
framework to address unique aspects of the industry and the regulatory
challenges it poses.