Upgrade needed: South African tobacco control policy and the WHO-framework convention on tobacco control
More details
Hide details
1
University of California San Francisco, Canter for Tobacco Control Research and Education, United States of America
2
University of California San Francisco, United States of America
3
University of California San Francisco, Social and Behavioral Sciences Department, School of Nursing, United States of America
4
University of California San Francisco, Department of Medicine (Cardiology), Cardiovascular Research Institute, Philip R. Lee Institute for Health Policy Studies, Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, United States of America
Publication date: 2018-03-01
Tob. Induc. Dis. 2018;16(Suppl 1):A13
Download abstract book (PDF)
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Background:
Tobacco control policy
in South Africa was one of the strongest in the African continent before the
WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC) entry into force in 2005.
South Africa ratified the FCTC in 2005 and the treaty came into force same
year. However, with many African governments keying into implementation
of the FCTC, South African tobacco control laws are lagging
behind with regards to compliance with FCTC requirements.
Methods:
We reviewed South Africa's current tobacco control laws with the aim of
identifying key areas including smoke-free public places, packing and
labelling and tobacco advertising, promotion and sponsorship, which are in need
of additional regulations or amendments to make
the tobacco laws more FCTC-compliant.
Results:
Under
smoke-free regulations, there is need to have hospitals and patients' rooms
100% smoke-free and smoke-free work place policies should be effectively implemented.
The proportion of tobacco packages with health warning labels (HWL) need to be
upgraded from 20% to at least 30%, although the evidence now
supports much larger warnings and these must be considered. HWL should be
in English and the predominant languages of South Africa to allow for a better
understanding of these warnings by the people. On tobacco advertising,
promotion and sponsorship, the South African law needs to be tightened around
international and cross border advertisement of tobacco products, allowance of charitable
financial contributions and points-of-sale advertising.
Conclusions:
There
is evidence supporting strengthening the existing legislation and to make the policy
more aligned with the FCTC standard regulations. However, if tobacco industry
opposition at the national level remains strong, the South African tobacco
law allows for provinces to make stronger laws than the national law. This
provision of the law can be exploited by tobacco control advocates to sensitize
provincial governments to make tobacco control laws at the provincial level
more FCTC-compliant.