Why are male Chinese smokers unwilling to quit? - A cross-sectional study on smoking rationalization and intention to quit
More details
Hide details
1
Fudan University, China
2
Pudong New Area Center for Disease Control and Prevention, China
3
Guangxi Medical University, China
4
Mudanjiang Medical University, China
5
University of Sydney, Australia
Publication date: 2018-03-01
Tob. Induc. Dis. 2018;16(Suppl 1):A866
Download abstract book (PDF)
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Background:
While having the largest population of smokers in the
world, China is among countries with the lowest percentage of male smokers
who have an intention to quit. Smoking
rationalization is negatively associated with quit intention in developed countries. Our previous
study has showed smoking rationalization is common among Chinese male
smokers and some beliefs of smoking rationalization seem to be peculiar to
China. Whether the association is generalizable to Chinese smokers remains
unknown. This study aims to examine the association between smoking rationalization
and quit intention among a sample of male Chinese smokers.
Methods:
A cross-sectional survey was conducted among male smokers in China in 2013.
Smoking rationalization was assessed through a newly developed Chinese
rationalizations scale (including 26 items under six subscales, smoking
functional beliefs, risk generalization beliefs, social acceptability beliefs,
safe smoking beliefs, self-exempting beliefs and quitting is harmful beliefs).
Items in the scale were rated on a 5-likert scale (1 = totally disagree to 5 =
totally agree). Multivariable logistic regression was performed to examine the
relationship between rationalization and intention to quit, adjusted for
sociodemographic variables and smoking-related variables.
Results:
A total of 3710 participants were included in the analyses. Smoking rationalization
was prevalent (mean score 3.32). With 1 point increase in total rationalization
scale, the odds for smokers intention to quit in the next 6 months decreased
48% (OR=0.52, 95%CI: 0.44-0.61; p< 0.001). Separate logistic regressions for six
subscale of rationalization showed consistent associations with intention to
quit (all p-values < 0.001). Particularly the “social acceptability beliefs”
was the strongest predictor (OR=0.62, 95%CI: 0.55-0.71; p< 0.001).
Conclusions:
Smoking rationalization beliefs could be important barriers for male Chinese
smokers to develop quit intention. Some beliefs have stronger association
with quit intention than others. Tackling rationalization beliefs endorsed by
smokers is a potential strategy for smoking cessation intervention.
CITATIONS (1):
1.
Counter-attitudinal intervention decreased positive attitudes and behavioral tendencies towards video games
Jingmin Lin, Ru-De Liu, Yi Ding, Yi Yang, Shuyang Jiang, Zien Ding
Computers & Education